East vs. West: Malaysian vs. Kiwi Education (Part 3)

3. Memorization of Scientific Facts vs. Hands-on Practical Experiences

As I’ve noted before, Malaysian education is all about exams – the goal is not to promote practical knowledge, but to get an unbroken list of “A+”s on the exam transcript. So when it comes to science, we don’t care that much about the experiments. After all, why waste time doing the scientific experiments with care when we can be getting tips on how to score on the Biology exam?

In Piopio College, on the other hand, it’s not just all about memorizing chemical equations. The teachers do care that the students get the chance to explore science through experiments, and they do insist that the students do experiments the proper, scientific way. Although I went to Year 12 in Piopio College as a Year 10 student back in Malaysia and scored better than everyone else, I was humbled when it came to using the proper apparatus to conduct an experiment on acid-base neutralization. That’s the moment I realized that all those facts floating aimlessly in my memory weren’t really that useful after all.

In Malaysia, 10% of our Sijil Perperiksaan Malaysia (SPM, the Malaysian GCSE) marks for the 3 science subjects – Physics, Chemistry, and Biology – comes from a selected list of scientific experiments done during Year 10 and Year 11. The idea was to let us do some experiments related to our curriculum, and at the same time nurture our interest in science, under the guidance of a teacher, or course.

We took the “guidance of a teacher” part way too far.

“I’ve got the results and conclusion before I even started the experiment!”

Here’s how we get those 10%. First, the students do the experiment. Then everyone writes a report, which is graded by the teacher. The teacher will give marks based numerous criteria, such as “Is the report complete?”, “Did the student show interest?”, “Did the student show dedication and teamwork”, and “Did the student thank God?” No, I wasn’t joking about the last one. Anyway, there are a few experiments in Year 10, a few more in Year 11, and all the marks are compiled into a report, which is stored together with the scientific reports in a folder. The school then submits the marks to the government. All done!

But you know, we’re all about getting excellent results in the exams, and of course, we want to ensure that we get the full 10% for our exams. So here’s what the teachers do. A few days before we even start the experiment, the teacher hands out papers containing a complete scientific report, with the hypothesis, list of procedures, conclusion etc. and orders us to copy the whole thing down. So now the whole class, no, all Year 10/11 students have a “perfect” report that fulfills all the criteria listed out by the Ministry of Education! Hooray!

Well, except for the results of the experiment. We may have the conclusion already, but we haven’t done the experiments, so how are we getting the results? Besides, it’s not like we can just skip the experiment altogether; if an official from the Ministry of Education finds that out, the school will have some explaining to do. So we carry out the experiment. Some actually do the experiment, while some just watch, apparently disinterested or too scared to handle a Bunsen burner.

But then, the teachers never gave us any formal training on how to properly conduct an experiment, except for a few reminders here and there, so the results are often a mess. Ah, no worries! Teacher says, “Never mind. Just copy the results of the guy got it right.” We scurry around, looking for that lucky guy, then copy his experiment’s results. Tada! A complete report! Now we give the reports to the teacher. The teacher checks if the scientific reports are complete, and then gives everyone full marks. Done.

Yao Ming Face

The Kiwis got it Right

Now of course, Piopio College is still a high school, and we don’t have the amount of freedom that undergrads have. The teachers still tell us what to do, give us instructions on how to use lab stuff properly, etc. However, the main difference is that the Kiwi educational system lets the students really learn the purpose of doing scientific experiments.

The students start an experiment in Piopio College with the teacher explaining what should be done on the day. Everyone dresses up in lab coats, and starts doing the experiments. The methods and procedures used are still fairly fixed, although they aren’t quite as rigid as in Malaysia – the students are allowed a little more freedom.

When we finally get a satisfactory result (one that is fairly consistent, follows an expected pattern, etc.), then only we write our reports, which are of course our own work. I still wonder what were the Kiwi students thinking when I asked them “how should I write this report?” or “What does the teacher expect to see?” Culture-shock, you see.

There’s one more thing. In Piopio College, when it comes to experiments, the students don’t cheat. If they get a weird result, they’ll repeat the experiments until they get it right. I was teamed up with guy while doing an acid-base titration experiment. For some reason, we kept on getting the results wrong, as the measurements collected were too far apart. The teacher insisted that the difference between the volumes measured must not exceed 0.2ml. At some point, I asked him, “Hey, our results are really close this time; do we really have to do this again? (Hint, hint)” He said yes. In Malaysia, if we had a crappy experiment, we’ll copy the results of another team, or just falsify the data, like this guy.
Andrew Wakefield
Thanks for the measles outbreak in the UK, Andrew. (Taken from the Huffington Post)

To sum things up, here’s the difference between Malaysia and New Zealand education when it comes to science: New Zealand schools produce students that are familiar with the scientific method, able to conduct experiments and write report properly, and are honest – in short, Kiwi schools produce scientists. Malaysian schools produce sneaky businessmen through science education. Hey, perhaps there’s something to celebrate about Malaysian education anyway.


Malaysia Sends Saudi Back to be Beheaded

Why, Malaysia, why?

23-year old Saudi journalist Hamza Kashgari was detained by Malaysia officials at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) while en route to New Zealand. Why, you ask? Well, Kashgari was escaping from Saudi officials who wants him dead over 3 Twitter posts that “insulted” the Prophet Muhammad:

1. On your birthday, I will say that I have loved the rebel in you, that you’ve always been a source of inspiration to me, and that I do not like the halos of divinity around you. I shall not pray for you.

2. On your birthday, I find you wherever I turn. I will say that I have loved aspects of you, hated others, and could not understand many more.

3. On your birthday, I shall not bow to you. I shall not kiss your hand. Rather, I shall shake it as equals do, and smile at you as you smile at me. I shall speak to you as a friend, no more.

In response, about 30,000 tweets called for his punishment. The Saudi cleric Naseer al-Omar called for Kashgari’s execution for his “blasphemy”.

Yet personally, I do not find this even remotely insulting. Yes, he may have criticized some aspects of the Prophet, and he most certainly doesn’t view Muhammad as a divine being that deserves worship, but that’s what all non-Muslims around the world – Christians, Buddhists, Wiccans, Scientologists etc. probably think anyway. Now if he had used words such as “f*ck”, “b*tch”, etc. or pointed the middle finger., then that would be insulting, but the way I see it, his words are certainly tame. Plus, I wouldn’t wish the death of anyone who insulted me, no matter how much I hate it. I’m sure anyone with a conscience will think the same way.

The Malaysian Home Minister, Hishammuddin Hussein tried to justify the deportation:

…I will not allow Malaysia to be seen as a safe country for terrorists and those who are wanted by their countries of origin, and also be seen as a transit county…

I do not believe that Kashgari deserves to be compared to the likes of Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi, people who have committed crimes against humanity and murdered thousands of innocent civilians. He just posted a few tweets, and has never threatened anyone.

To justify its action, the Malaysian police also claimed that it was working with Interpol. However, Interpol has denied any involvement on Monday:

…no Interpol channels, its national central bureaus in Kuala Lumpur and Riyadh nor its general secretariat headquarters in Lyon, France were involved at any time in this case…

Regardless, what the Malaysian government did on Sunday is certainly unjustifiable with regards to human rights and liberty. Under no circumstances will I condone the Malaysian government’s violation of international human rights to appease the Saudi officials.

Today, I am deeply disappointed with what the government has done.


East vs. West: Malaysian vs. Kiwi Education (Part 2)

…continued

2. Strict vs. Lax Discipline

This is superfluously obvious. While in Malaysian schools you can face disciplinary action for eating a candy, in Piopio College I have had a classmate bring food (apple caramel cake, was it?) into the class after her cooking lesson to share with the class. That includes the teacher. Of course, it depends on the teacher, but you get my point.

Malaysian schools (Chinese ones in particular) seem to be very keen to enforce what they call “discipline”. Some rules are reasonable – hand up homework on time, don’t come to school late, and don’t punch someone in the face. On the other hand, many other rules, especially those related to clothing and grooming, make no sense. For instance, in most Chinese schools I’ve heard of, boys’ hair most not be longer that 2.5cm (1 inch), must not have sideburns, and must not be “fashionable”. Then there are the rules stating that only glasses with black frames can be worn, only canvas white shoes can be worn, no hair styling products can be used, no “expensive” items can be brought to school, etc. Apparently looking good is a disciplinary problem.

Red Glasses Parody
Created using Despair, Inc. Credit for image goes to: César Acebal

On the other hand, in Piopio College, the rules are much, much more lax. Students there get to bring cellphones, Ipods, cameras, etc. to school, as long as they don’t use them during class. And while most students still need to wear uniforms to school, Year 12 and Year 13 are quite free to wear whatever they want. The best thing is, there aren’t any weird rules regarding students’ glasses and hairstyles.

Rattan Cane
The rattan cane: striking fear into the hearts of Malaysian students for years. (Credit: Neitram)

The 2 education systems also differ in their methods of punishment. In Malaysia, there’s the demerit system, where you accumulate demerit points based on your wrongdoings (it’s not that hard, really), and get punished accordingly. Caning is still alive and well, although it’s mostly used on students below 15 years of age (Year 9 in Malaysia). The caning of Year 10 and Year 11 students isn’t unheard of, though.

On the other hand, the “harshest” punishment in Piopio College is detention. For minor offences, you get detention in the teacher’s office during recess, and sometimes for only 10 minutes (that’s a punishment? Seriously?). Even when a student always comes to school late, ignores teachers, and never hands up homework, the most he/she will probably get is an after-school detention and a meeting with the parents.

So to keep it simple: in New Zealand, I’ve seen students getting late to class every for single day of the week. In my school, if anyone even attempts such a feat for 2 consecutive days, he’s gonna be f***ed.

So which one’s better? Should schools be as strict as in Malaysia to the point of being, well, pointless, or should they be as lax as in New Zealand, where students repeatedly break school rules without fear? I don’t know. You decide.


East vs. West: Malaysian vs. Kiwi Education (Part 1)

During July 2010, I went to New Zealand on an American Field Service (AFS) student exchange program for 8 weeks. I lived with my awesome host family there – Pākehā dad,  Māori mom, and two cute little kids – on their farm, with cows and sheep and stuff. Made lots of great friends too – Pākehās, Māoris, and even 2 Spanish exchange students. Need I say that it was an exciting and unforgettable experience?

But let’s leave those stories for another time. What I want to talk about here are the differences between Malaysian education and Kiwi education. Hailing from a Malaysian Chinese school – Chung Ling High School, I couldn’t help but notice that there are stark differences between both education systems, be it in philosophy, syllabus, or teaching methods. Here’s what I have to say based on my first-hand, personal experiences of enrolling in Piopio College as a Year 12 student for almost 7 weeks. Let it begin:

Malaysian Education vs. Kiwi Education

1. Memorization & Tricks vs. Actual Understanding of the Subject

In Malaysia, learning is all about memorizing the “key points” so that students score well on exams. For example, a Biology lesson may go like this:

Teacher: Myelin sheaths on the axons of neurons speed up the transmission of nerve impulses. Remember this. It’s quite popular in exams.

Student: But how does adding insulators along the length of the axon speed up ELECTRICAL impulses?

Teacher: You don’t have to know that, since it’s not gonna come up in exams anyway.

It’s even worse for Moral Studies. Here’s how it’s like:

Teacher: Please memorize the definition for the value “Belief in God”: “To believe that God is the creator of the Universe and to heed to His orders according to one’s religious beliefs in accordance with the Constitution.” If you get any of those words wrong during the exams, you’ll won’t get any marks.

No words on why belief in God is moral, and nor does anyone notice that not all religions have one, personal God (Buddhism and Daoism, anyone?). Instead, we’re expected to just memorize the definitions for a list of moral values (there’s 36 in total), and write them down during exams, without changing, adding, or missing a word.

Then there’s the culture of “spotting” questions. Malaysian teachers and students alike are really well-versed in the art of guessing what questions will be present in the following exams based on previous exams. Here’s a tip: “If a question has been asked during the last 2 years, it won’t be asked this year. ” We literally had a seminar on the questions that may be asked during the 2011 nationwide History exam based on our school teachers’ predictions. True story.

On the other hand, it’s quite different in New Zealand. Not that I don’t have to memorize anything, but the emphasis seems to be less on exams and more on actually knowing what is being taught.

For instance, during a class on evolution, the teacher used case studies and hypothetical situations (e.g. imagine what could be happening at the time based on these fossilized footprints) to ensure that we understood evolutionary theory. I still remember how everyone was given a few pics of alien creatures and had to create an evolutionary tree based his/her understanding of evolution. Same goes for other subjects as well, be it Chemistry, Physics, or Physical Education. Of course, it varies from teacher to teacher, but at least I’ve never heard a Kiwi teacher say: “Ssshhhh… these are the tips for the next exam…”

Glossary

Māori – the indigenous race of New Zealand

Pākehā – Māori slang for whites

Kiwi – slang for anything New Zealand related


“Hot” and “Cold” in Chinese Medicine–A Meaningless Concept

Stop eating chocolates, you’re already on heat.

Don’t eat durians and drink alcohol together, you’ll get too hot.

Stop drinking iced water, you’ll get cold.

You’ll be on heat if you eat more of those chilies.

Those of us born in Chinese families will certainly be familiar with these well-meant advices from our parents and grandparents. For those who weren’t, I just gave a few examples of the “Hot/Cold” concept that is so prevalent among Chinese communities (and even Malay communities from what I’ve observed). In fact, it’s so deeply rooted in Chinese belief that no one even thinks of questioning it; sort of like how no one ever questions the fact that gravity exists. Except yours truly, of course.

What is the “Hot/Cold” Concept?

Yin and Yang
Yin and Yang, where the “Hot/Cold” concept came from. (Credit: Gregory Maxwell)

The concept is used in traditional Chinese medicine to refer to to the “energies” of foods and drinks, and is derived from the Yin/Yang concept in Daoism, Hot being Yang (阳), the masculine, aggressive, force, and Cold being Yin (阴), the feminine, passive force. Any food can be roughly classified into Hot, Cold, and Neutral categories.

If one eats to much hot foods, one will be on heat, and will get symptoms such as sore throat, fever, phlegm, constipation, and diarrhea (huh?). If one drinks too much cold drinks, he/she will get cold and get runny nose, cough, and fever (what?).

Here are a few examples of foods and drinks in each category:

Hot/热 Durian, Wine, Petai, Chili, Coffee, Nutmeg, Longan, Chocolate
Cold/冷 Apples, Oranges, Chrysanthemum Tea, Liang (Cool) Tea, Plain Water, Ice
Neutral Rice, Potatoes, Poultry

So What’s the Problem with the concept?

1. It contradicts modern medical knowledge.

One does not simply get the flu after drinking iced water; he/she must get infected by the flu virus first. Similarly, we now know that fever can be induced by pathogens, and may be a self-defense mechanism to defend against infections. One does not simply get fever by eating durians. There is no mystical energy involved at all.

2. It’s too vague.

In fact, way too vague, to the point that it’s essentially meaningless. The table below shows a comparison of the physiological effects commonly attributed to 3 hot foods/drinks – chili, chocolate, and wine – and one cold drink – iced water. Please correct me if I’m mistaken.

  Chili Chocolate Wine Iced Water
Feeling of Hotness Yes No Yes No
Constipation Depends Yes No No
Diarrhea Yes No No No
Sore Throat Yes Yes No No
Phlegm No Yes No Yes
Runny Nose No No No Yes
Fever Depends Yes No Yes

Take a look the characteristics of the 3 hot foods. As you can see, the effects attributed to chili are quite different from chocolate. On the other hand, although wine only fits 1 out of the 7 criteria, it’s “hot”, while iced water fits 3 out of the 7 criteria, and yet it’s “cold”. Someone explain this please.

3. It ignores the different mechanisms of action for different foods with the similar effects.

ChiliesWine
Both chilies and wine make you warm/hot, but they work via really different ways(Credit: Ramac and Fabio Ingrosso, respectively)

Take “Feeling of Hotness”, which both chili and wine causes.

Alcohol causes a warm feeling because ethanol (the type of alcohol that we drink) is a vasodilator, which means that it causes the blood vessels on the skin to dilate. Blood flow to the skin is increased, and therefore one feels warm. The same mechanism is responsible for the “Alcohol Flushing Syndrome” in some Asians. How exactly this works is still being researched.

Chili, on the other hand, acts via a chemical called capsaicin. Capsaicin is responsible for that spicy, hot taste, and for those who are not used to chilies, it gives you diarrhea. In your mouth (and on your lips), capsaicin binds to a receptor called TRPV1, which sends heat and pain signals to your brain. That’s why chilies are so hot. In the stomach and intestines, capsaicin speeds up peristalsis, your feces get excreted too quickly, and that causes diarrhea. Capsaicin also excites the sympathetic nervous system, which causes the “fight-or-flight” response (sort of), and makes you feel warm.

Oh, and the worst part about the concept – how can diarrhea and constipation both be symptoms of someone who is on heat?

I rest my case.


Happy Dragon Year 2012! 2012 龙年快乐!

Chinese Dragon Sculpture in the Summer Palace, Beijing
Sculpture of a Chinese Dragon in the Summer Palace in Beijing, China. Credit goes to Fanghong.

Hey guess what? From this day (January 23 2012, Monday) onwards, it’s the Year of the Dragon! The dragon is the 5th out of the 12 Chinese Zodiac animals, and it’s the only zodiac animal that is mythical and has superpowers.

And I’m not talking about those evil fire-breathing medieval dragons that get killed by knights in shining armor, mind you. The Chinese dragon is widely revered in traditional Chinese culture and symbolizes auspiciousness, good luck, prosperity, and power.

The Chinese dragon is said to be the combination of 9 animals – it has the mane of a lion, beard of a goat, eyes of a demon, ears of a cow, shape of a snake, claws of an eagle, horns of a stag, scales of a fish, and the face of Sarah Jessica Parker. It controls the weather, unleashes torrential rains and floods, and can manifest itself as tornadoes and cyclones. Basically Chinese dragons are like Storm from X-Men, but much more awesome.

Supposedly, if you’re born in the Year of the Dragon* (…,1952, 1964, 1976, 1988, 2000, 2012,…), you will be proud, noble, outspoken, intellectual, passionate, resolute, loyal, with an artistic side. On the flip side, you may be brazen, arrogant, tyrannical, intolerant, dogmatic, and have violent tendencies. Sort of like Aries.

But you know what? What really matters is that Chinese New Year is the time where the entire extended family can come together for a reunion, have fun, and actually clean up the house. Oh, and those who aren’t married yet get angpaus (red packets with money) from elders! Though you’ll have to pay that money back when you’re married anyway.

My angpaus for 2012
My “angpaus” for this year. If you get one, no need to feel guilty .You’re gonna pay it back one day anyway.

So again, Happy Chinese New Year 2012, and wish you a prosperous Dragon Year!

Oh, and wear red today and tomorrow. RED, I tell you. Don’t you ever wear black.

*Note: You could be a Rabbit if you were born on 1988 (or any year listed above). You see, the Chinese year does not start until late January to early February (it varies by year), so if you’re born on January 3rd 1988, then you’re a rabbit. Similarly, if you’re born on January 7th 1989, then you’re still a Dragon.


On SOPA

Stop SOPA!

Very soon, the US government may pass an act, that if implemented, will potentially threaten free speech on the Internet. It’s called SOPA (Stop Online Piracy Act), or H.R.3261.

The bill’s goal is:

To promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship, and innovation by combating the theft of U.S. property, and for other purposes

Now, I am not against SOPA because I would love to steal other’s copyrighted work for my own profit, though I admit that I have done so in the past *hides in shame, vows never to repeat it again*. I do believe that using other’s intellectual properties for commercial purposes is unjustified.

What I am actually against is the ways SOPA deal with copyright infringers. See what the bill has to say regarding search engines:

A provider of an Internet search engine shall take technically feasible and reasonable measures, as expeditiously as possible, but in any case within 5 days after being served with a copy of the order, or within such time as the court may order, designed to prevent the foreign infringing site that is subject to the order, or a portion of such site specified in the order, from being served as a direct hypertext link.

and advertising services:

An Internet advertising service that contracts to provide advertising to or for the foreign infringing site, or portion thereof, that is subject to the order, or that knowingly serves advertising to or for such site or  such portion thereof, shall take technically feasible and reasonable measures, as expeditiously as possible, but in any case within 5 days after being served with a copy of the order, or within such time as the court may order, designed to-

  1. prevent its service from providing advertisements to or relating to the foreign infringing site that is subject to the order or a portion of such site specified in the order;
  2. cease making available advertisements for the foreign infringing site or such portion thereof, or paid or sponsored search results, links, or other placements that provide access to such foreign infringing site or such portion thereof; and
  3. cease providing or receiving any compensation for advertising or related services to, from, or in connection with such foreign infringing site or such portion thereof.

The full bill can be found here.

In both cases, the message is simple – deny access to any site (or part of it) that contains unauthorized use of copyrighted material. The problem is that the act effectively allows the US government to take action against websites that link to a website that has a link to a website that misuses copyrighted material.

If it isn’t clear yet, the problem with SOPA is this: it’s too general. Say I am an US citizen, and I have an advertisement on my blog (the horror), which I host on my own domain. Let’s call it Site HP. Now, that advertisement, contains a link to another Site A. Site A links a Site B, which contains user-generated content (think Youtube, Facebook, WordPress). And in Site B, there’s a user which knowingly uses copyrighted material without prior authorization.

So what can the US government do then? If SOPA is implemented, it can send a court order to demand that I remove the advertisement within a given time frame, or else it can take legal action against me, including fines and jails and stuff. Why? Because I had an advertisement on my blog that is indirectly related to a site that misuses copyrighted material.

The question is: what does that have to do with me anyway? I linked to Site A, but that doesn’t mean I endorse what that user of Site B is doing. Worse still, I’ve skimmed through the bill, and I don’t see how does the bill differentiate between non-commercial use and commercial use of said material; correct me if I’m wrong. Your website can be blocked simply because you had a video with “Baby” as background music.

This is not to say that SOPA is entirely bullshit; there are parts of SOPA that I agree with. For instance, it would certainly be prudent to take action against sites/companies that sell banned/unauthorized medications. This, after all, is a matter of public health and human life. But still, that doesn’t justify the harm that SOPA will do to the Internet community as a whole.

The good news is, the markup of SOPA by the House of Representatives has been postponed to February. That means that we have more time to let the government know what we think.

Therefore, if you haven’t done so, please sign these petitions:

Read More

The bill itself.

The Obama’s Administration’s reaction to the “STOP the E-PARASITE Act” and the “VETO the SOPA bill and any other future bills that threaten to diminish the free flow of information” petitions: Combating Online Piracy while Protecting an Open and Innovative Internet

The Bill Summary & Status.

Mashable article on SOPA, and why it harms the average Internet user.

If you prefer videos, here:


“Corruption of moral values? Must be those Westerners!”

Yes, you read that right. You Westerners are responsible for every single shit that’s happening today in Malaysia – increased crime rates, increased murders, open expression of sexuality, homosexuality, pornography, prostitution, violent games, individualism, heightening divorce rates, and *gasp* Western fashion! Shame on you with flooding our nation with your evil, hedonistic, corrupt culture!

Or at least, that’s what the government wants me (and most students in Malaysia) to believe.

You see, during my 11 years in government school, I’ve wrote lots of essays. Lots. And among those essays, one of the most popular topics is “The Corruption of Local Customs/Morals of Teenagers/Conservative Values”. And for 11 years, my fellow schoolmates and I have (and are expected to) followed this politically correct (in Malaysia, that is), time-tested formula while writing said topic:

The Formula

1. The Introduction

Start by writing about how shitty Malaysia is nowadays with all those social issues and crimes happening. If the topic’s specifically about teenagers, explain that teens here have forgotten local, traditional values and are increasingly corrupt morally.

2. The Bashing

After the introduction, find out who caused all these stuff. Ah yes! Must be those Westerners! (Americans, British, Russians, Germans, they’re all the same, right?)

Then, write about the problems they have wrought upon our country.

Increased murder rates? Check.

Proliferation of rape and incest? Check.

Family violence? Check.

LGBT acceptance? Check.

Females wearing “suggestive” clothing? Check.

People who dare to stand up against the authorities? Check!

(No need to quote any statistics or studies, we all know they’re true.)

3. The Grand Solution

What is the answer to those problems then? Ah, by making Malaysian/Eastern cultures and values cool again, of course. Start teaching  in schools about how great local values are. Teach school children on the nobleness of traditional, conservative values.

But most importantly, we must reintroduce religion into our society. All of those social ailments listed above can be traced to a lack of faith in religion, and we ought to start teaching religious values to our children from the moment they are born. (What? Secular ethics, critical thinking, and philosophy? What is that anyway?)

4. The Conclusion.

Summarize everything written above into one, final paragraph – Modern society is getting worse, Westerners are to blame for everything, and traditional/conservative values are the solution to everything. Done.

Congratulations! Now you can get an ‘A’ in essay writing too!


So what do you guys think? And to those from other countries, do you see propaganda of a similar nature being taught to students in schools?

Disclaimer: This is just a light-hearted post that I wrote to satirize how governments impose their agenda and propaganda upon students in school without teaching them to think critically and rationally. It’s not an in-depth discussion about the merits of various philosophies and ethical views.Smile


Abortion is Mostly Justified (Part 3)

I find that too often in discussions about abortion, the mother’s rights get ignored. Since my previous posts were concerned with the fetus’s rights, let’s look at abortion from the mother’s point of view for a change. Let me start by writing about

A Commonly Held Self-Contradicting View

Now, almost everyone I’ve met supports abortion in the case that the mother was raped, even if they hold a pro-life stance. In fact, I’ve actually seen this view being actively promoted in not-for-sale Malaysian Buddhist videos (don’t know about Buddhism elsewhere). However, such a view is self-contradicting. Let me explain.

The most common explanation given for such a view is that since the mother didn’t choose to have the baby of the rapist, she has the rights to terminate the pregnancy. However, this view implicitly affirms the mother’s rights to chose to abort the baby – it is essentially a pro-choice view. To deny the mother the choice to abort her baby in other situations, then, is to take a double standard on this issue.

It follows then that there are only two internally consistent views on this issue – either deny the mother the rights to abort her fetus even if she is raped; or to affirm the mother’s rights to choose the fate of her unborn-as-yet-child. The first view is absurd – one that only the most extreme pro-choice individuals would support; and as I shall show in the next post, the second view is vastly more humane and reasonable.

PS: I know, I’ve skipped the argument on how pre-viability fetus lack certain traits that grants them human rights. My excuse? I think that it’s quite a messy argument, and I believe it is one that would be better left to a discussion on animal rights.


Abortion is Mostly Justified (Part 2)

While discussing whether abortion is morally sound with my friends, I’ve noticed that while most of them are OK with stem cell research (which destroys a ball-shaped blastula), they are against abortion when the fetus starts to resemble a human. They say that it’s cruel. I have also noticed arguments stating that fetuses are genetically human, and consequently have the same rights as fully developed humans.

Both arguments do not stand up to scrutiny. In this post, I shall show that, whether an entity looks human or is genetically human has very little, if any bearing on its moral rights.

6 week old fetus
Contrary to popular opinion, the 6-week old fetus (Credit: lunar caustic) above is not entitled to greater moral rights than the morula(1) and the blastula(2) below simply by the virtue of being more humanlike (Credit: Pidalka44).
Blastulation

Let ponder for a moment: What makes a human, and how does that give one moral rights?

The way I see it, there are two aspects to a human being. There is of course, the biological/physical aspect. A human must have the Homo sapiens genome, the anatomy of a relatively hairless, upright primate, and most importantly, be alive. A person who meets all of the criteria above is physically human.

But do we posses moral rights simply by the virtue of being biologically Homo sapiens? No. Imagine that history was altered, and Mother Nature decided that having a tail, two horns, plus red skin is advantageous for survival, and all humans look like the Devil (and have a completely different genome). Does that means that our moral rights are diminished in any way?

Alright, so that sounded quite stupid. But my point stands. There’s no reason why our series of nucleotides are morally superior to that of a cauliflower’s. Nor are we more deserving of greater moral rights because we walk instead of fly (frankly, it should be the other way around). Our biological and physical traits don’t translate into moral rights.

The other aspect is the non-physical aspect (for the lack of a better term). This encompasses personality, consciousness, thoughts etc. This is the aspect that we consider when contemplating moral issues.

For example, when we to try to judge whether someone is guilty for the death of another, we don’t think in terms of his/her physical aspects – oh, he’s black, so he is guilty; oh, she’s disabled, so she is wrong etc. To do so is extremely discriminatory and simply wrong. Instead, we think in terms of: was it his/her intent to take the life of the person?

This applies to non-humans too. When we deciding whether an entity has intrinsic moral rights, we look at whether it is conscious and is capable of feeling pain. Thus the concept of animal rights, which encompasses creatures from birds to dogs to apes, which are quite different physically.

It is therefore not our physical traits, but the non-physical traits that gives us moral rights, and it follows that when discussing whether does any entity (including a fetus) have moral rights, only the non-physical traits should be taken into consideration.

To conclude, while aborting a fetus may feel cruel to some, it simply doesn’t mean that abortion is morally wrong, and the fact that fetuses are genetically human doesn’t mean anything. When deciding what rights an entity has, only the non-physical aspects matter.

What do you think? Post your thoughts below in the comments section!


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 239 other followers