East vs. West: Malaysian vs. Kiwi Education (Part 3)

3. Memorization of Scientific Facts vs. Hands-on Practical Experiences

As I’ve noted before, Malaysian education is all about exams – the goal is not to promote practical knowledge, but to get an unbroken list of “A+”s on the exam transcript. So when it comes to science, we don’t care that much about the experiments. After all, why waste time doing the scientific experiments with care when we can be getting tips on how to score on the Biology exam?

In Piopio College, on the other hand, it’s not just all about memorizing chemical equations. The teachers do care that the students get the chance to explore science through experiments, and they do insist that the students do experiments the proper, scientific way. Although I went to Year 12 in Piopio College as a Year 10 student back in Malaysia and scored better than everyone else, I was humbled when it came to using the proper apparatus to conduct an experiment on acid-base neutralization. That’s the moment I realized that all those facts floating aimlessly in my memory weren’t really that useful after all.

In Malaysia, 10% of our Sijil Perperiksaan Malaysia (SPM, the Malaysian GCSE) marks for the 3 science subjects – Physics, Chemistry, and Biology – comes from a selected list of scientific experiments done during Year 10 and Year 11. The idea was to let us do some experiments related to our curriculum, and at the same time nurture our interest in science, under the guidance of a teacher, or course.

We took the “guidance of a teacher” part way too far.

“I’ve got the results and conclusion before I even started the experiment!”

Here’s how we get those 10%. First, the students do the experiment. Then everyone writes a report, which is graded by the teacher. The teacher will give marks based numerous criteria, such as “Is the report complete?”, “Did the student show interest?”, “Did the student show dedication and teamwork”, and “Did the student thank God?” No, I wasn’t joking about the last one. Anyway, there are a few experiments in Year 10, a few more in Year 11, and all the marks are compiled into a report, which is stored together with the scientific reports in a folder. The school then submits the marks to the government. All done!

But you know, we’re all about getting excellent results in the exams, and of course, we want to ensure that we get the full 10% for our exams. So here’s what the teachers do. A few days before we even start the experiment, the teacher hands out papers containing a complete scientific report, with the hypothesis, list of procedures, conclusion etc. and orders us to copy the whole thing down. So now the whole class, no, all Year 10/11 students have a “perfect” report that fulfills all the criteria listed out by the Ministry of Education! Hooray!

Well, except for the results of the experiment. We may have the conclusion already, but we haven’t done the experiments, so how are we getting the results? Besides, it’s not like we can just skip the experiment altogether; if an official from the Ministry of Education finds that out, the school will have some explaining to do. So we carry out the experiment. Some actually do the experiment, while some just watch, apparently disinterested or too scared to handle a Bunsen burner.

But then, the teachers never gave us any formal training on how to properly conduct an experiment, except for a few reminders here and there, so the results are often a mess. Ah, no worries! Teacher says, “Never mind. Just copy the results of the guy got it right.” We scurry around, looking for that lucky guy, then copy his experiment’s results. Tada! A complete report! Now we give the reports to the teacher. The teacher checks if the scientific reports are complete, and then gives everyone full marks. Done.

Yao Ming Face

The Kiwis got it Right

Now of course, Piopio College is still a high school, and we don’t have the amount of freedom that undergrads have. The teachers still tell us what to do, give us instructions on how to use lab stuff properly, etc. However, the main difference is that the Kiwi educational system lets the students really learn the purpose of doing scientific experiments.

The students start an experiment in Piopio College with the teacher explaining what should be done on the day. Everyone dresses up in lab coats, and starts doing the experiments. The methods and procedures used are still fairly fixed, although they aren’t quite as rigid as in Malaysia – the students are allowed a little more freedom.

When we finally get a satisfactory result (one that is fairly consistent, follows an expected pattern, etc.), then only we write our reports, which are of course our own work. I still wonder what were the Kiwi students thinking when I asked them “how should I write this report?” or “What does the teacher expect to see?” Culture-shock, you see.

There’s one more thing. In Piopio College, when it comes to experiments, the students don’t cheat. If they get a weird result, they’ll repeat the experiments until they get it right. I was teamed up with guy while doing an acid-base titration experiment. For some reason, we kept on getting the results wrong, as the measurements collected were too far apart. The teacher insisted that the difference between the volumes measured must not exceed 0.2ml. At some point, I asked him, “Hey, our results are really close this time; do we really have to do this again? (Hint, hint)” He said yes. In Malaysia, if we had a crappy experiment, we’ll copy the results of another team, or just falsify the data, like this guy.
Andrew Wakefield
Thanks for the measles outbreak in the UK, Andrew. (Taken from the Huffington Post)

To sum things up, here’s the difference between Malaysia and New Zealand education when it comes to science: New Zealand schools produce students that are familiar with the scientific method, able to conduct experiments and write report properly, and are honest – in short, Kiwi schools produce scientists. Malaysian schools produce sneaky businessmen through science education. Hey, perhaps there’s something to celebrate about Malaysian education anyway.


Malaysia Sends Saudi Back to be Beheaded

Why, Malaysia, why?

23-year old Saudi journalist Hamza Kashgari was detained by Malaysia officials at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) while en route to New Zealand. Why, you ask? Well, Kashgari was escaping from Saudi officials who wants him dead over 3 Twitter posts that “insulted” the Prophet Muhammad:

1. On your birthday, I will say that I have loved the rebel in you, that you’ve always been a source of inspiration to me, and that I do not like the halos of divinity around you. I shall not pray for you.

2. On your birthday, I find you wherever I turn. I will say that I have loved aspects of you, hated others, and could not understand many more.

3. On your birthday, I shall not bow to you. I shall not kiss your hand. Rather, I shall shake it as equals do, and smile at you as you smile at me. I shall speak to you as a friend, no more.

In response, about 30,000 tweets called for his punishment. The Saudi cleric Naseer al-Omar called for Kashgari’s execution for his “blasphemy”.

Yet personally, I do not find this even remotely insulting. Yes, he may have criticized some aspects of the Prophet, and he most certainly doesn’t view Muhammad as a divine being that deserves worship, but that’s what all non-Muslims around the world – Christians, Buddhists, Wiccans, Scientologists etc. probably think anyway. Now if he had used words such as “f*ck”, “b*tch”, etc. or pointed the middle finger., then that would be insulting, but the way I see it, his words are certainly tame. Plus, I wouldn’t wish the death of anyone who insulted me, no matter how much I hate it. I’m sure anyone with a conscience will think the same way.

The Malaysian Home Minister, Hishammuddin Hussein tried to justify the deportation:

…I will not allow Malaysia to be seen as a safe country for terrorists and those who are wanted by their countries of origin, and also be seen as a transit county…

I do not believe that Kashgari deserves to be compared to the likes of Osama bin Laden, Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Gaddafi, people who have committed crimes against humanity and murdered thousands of innocent civilians. He just posted a few tweets, and has never threatened anyone.

To justify its action, the Malaysian police also claimed that it was working with Interpol. However, Interpol has denied any involvement on Monday:

…no Interpol channels, its national central bureaus in Kuala Lumpur and Riyadh nor its general secretariat headquarters in Lyon, France were involved at any time in this case…

Regardless, what the Malaysian government did on Sunday is certainly unjustifiable with regards to human rights and liberty. Under no circumstances will I condone the Malaysian government’s violation of international human rights to appease the Saudi officials.

Today, I am deeply disappointed with what the government has done.


East vs. West: Malaysian vs. Kiwi Education (Part 2)

…continued

2. Strict vs. Lax Discipline

This is superfluously obvious. While in Malaysian schools you can face disciplinary action for eating a candy, in Piopio College I have had a classmate bring food (apple caramel cake, was it?) into the class after her cooking lesson to share with the class. That includes the teacher. Of course, it depends on the teacher, but you get my point.

Malaysian schools (Chinese ones in particular) seem to be very keen to enforce what they call “discipline”. Some rules are reasonable – hand up homework on time, don’t come to school late, and don’t punch someone in the face. On the other hand, many other rules, especially those related to clothing and grooming, make no sense. For instance, in most Chinese schools I’ve heard of, boys’ hair most not be longer that 2.5cm (1 inch), must not have sideburns, and must not be “fashionable”. Then there are the rules stating that only glasses with black frames can be worn, only canvas white shoes can be worn, no hair styling products can be used, no “expensive” items can be brought to school, etc. Apparently looking good is a disciplinary problem.

Red Glasses Parody
Created using Despair, Inc. Credit for image goes to: César Acebal

On the other hand, in Piopio College, the rules are much, much more lax. Students there get to bring cellphones, Ipods, cameras, etc. to school, as long as they don’t use them during class. And while most students still need to wear uniforms to school, Year 12 and Year 13 are quite free to wear whatever they want. The best thing is, there aren’t any weird rules regarding students’ glasses and hairstyles.

Rattan Cane
The rattan cane: striking fear into the hearts of Malaysian students for years. (Credit: Neitram)

The 2 education systems also differ in their methods of punishment. In Malaysia, there’s the demerit system, where you accumulate demerit points based on your wrongdoings (it’s not that hard, really), and get punished accordingly. Caning is still alive and well, although it’s mostly used on students below 15 years of age (Year 9 in Malaysia). The caning of Year 10 and Year 11 students isn’t unheard of, though.

On the other hand, the “harshest” punishment in Piopio College is detention. For minor offences, you get detention in the teacher’s office during recess, and sometimes for only 10 minutes (that’s a punishment? Seriously?). Even when a student always comes to school late, ignores teachers, and never hands up homework, the most he/she will probably get is an after-school detention and a meeting with the parents.

So to keep it simple: in New Zealand, I’ve seen students getting late to class every for single day of the week. In my school, if anyone even attempts such a feat for 2 consecutive days, he’s gonna be f***ed.

So which one’s better? Should schools be as strict as in Malaysia to the point of being, well, pointless, or should they be as lax as in New Zealand, where students repeatedly break school rules without fear? I don’t know. You decide.


East vs. West: Malaysian vs. Kiwi Education (Part 1)

During July 2010, I went to New Zealand on an American Field Service (AFS) student exchange program for 8 weeks. I lived with my awesome host family there – Pākehā dad,  Māori mom, and two cute little kids – on their farm, with cows and sheep and stuff. Made lots of great friends too – Pākehās, Māoris, and even 2 Spanish exchange students. Need I say that it was an exciting and unforgettable experience?

But let’s leave those stories for another time. What I want to talk about here are the differences between Malaysian education and Kiwi education. Hailing from a Malaysian Chinese school – Chung Ling High School, I couldn’t help but notice that there are stark differences between both education systems, be it in philosophy, syllabus, or teaching methods. Here’s what I have to say based on my first-hand, personal experiences of enrolling in Piopio College as a Year 12 student for almost 7 weeks. Let it begin:

Malaysian Education vs. Kiwi Education

1. Memorization & Tricks vs. Actual Understanding of the Subject

In Malaysia, learning is all about memorizing the “key points” so that students score well on exams. For example, a Biology lesson may go like this:

Teacher: Myelin sheaths on the axons of neurons speed up the transmission of nerve impulses. Remember this. It’s quite popular in exams.

Student: But how does adding insulators along the length of the axon speed up ELECTRICAL impulses?

Teacher: You don’t have to know that, since it’s not gonna come up in exams anyway.

It’s even worse for Moral Studies. Here’s how it’s like:

Teacher: Please memorize the definition for the value “Belief in God”: “To believe that God is the creator of the Universe and to heed to His orders according to one’s religious beliefs in accordance with the Constitution.” If you get any of those words wrong during the exams, you’ll won’t get any marks.

No words on why belief in God is moral, and nor does anyone notice that not all religions have one, personal God (Buddhism and Daoism, anyone?). Instead, we’re expected to just memorize the definitions for a list of moral values (there’s 36 in total), and write them down during exams, without changing, adding, or missing a word.

Then there’s the culture of “spotting” questions. Malaysian teachers and students alike are really well-versed in the art of guessing what questions will be present in the following exams based on previous exams. Here’s a tip: “If a question has been asked during the last 2 years, it won’t be asked this year. ” We literally had a seminar on the questions that may be asked during the 2011 nationwide History exam based on our school teachers’ predictions. True story.

On the other hand, it’s quite different in New Zealand. Not that I don’t have to memorize anything, but the emphasis seems to be less on exams and more on actually knowing what is being taught.

For instance, during a class on evolution, the teacher used case studies and hypothetical situations (e.g. imagine what could be happening at the time based on these fossilized footprints) to ensure that we understood evolutionary theory. I still remember how everyone was given a few pics of alien creatures and had to create an evolutionary tree based his/her understanding of evolution. Same goes for other subjects as well, be it Chemistry, Physics, or Physical Education. Of course, it varies from teacher to teacher, but at least I’ve never heard a Kiwi teacher say: “Ssshhhh… these are the tips for the next exam…”

Glossary

Māori – the indigenous race of New Zealand

Pākehā – Māori slang for whites

Kiwi – slang for anything New Zealand related


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 239 other followers